All posts by anarchist blackcross ( naarm) melb

About anarchist blackcross ( naarm) melb

The Anarchist Black Cross is an international network of groups that gives practical support to prisoners of the class war. We give support to: * People imprisoned for resistance to capitalism: from strikers to revolutionaries * People framed by the police for ‘crimes’ they haven’t committed * Working class people locked-up for resisting the violence and exploitation in our daily lives, from people jailed for fighting back against abusive partners to people stealing back from the bosses * People imprisoned for the ‘crime’ of escaping from persecution and torture overseas * People resisting the prison system on the inside and out. Our activities range from practical assistance such as financial and other material aid to solidarity actions and campaigns on behalf of prisoners. We keep in regular contact with prisoners through visits and/or letter writing as well as publishing information about prisoners, the reality of prisons and the class system which creates them. Although we fight for changes that makes prisoner’s lives a bit easier, we know that prisons will never benefit us as working class people: they must be torn down along with the rest of the framework of repression that the ruling class uses against us. In all of what we do we are revolutionaries; we work towards the creation of a class based movement that will destroy capitalism and build a new world in it’s place…a world where we control our own lives, based not on profit and violence but on co-operation and community. We welcome contact and support from prisoners, their families and friends and anyone interested in what we do. We have active groups in many countries worldwide. If you would like to contact us then email abcmelb@yahoo.com.au Or you can write to us at: PO BOX 1364 VICTORIA 3066 AUSTRALIA

Mumia appeal update

Judge in Mumia appeal requests evidence of Castille bias

By Betsey Piette posted on December 17, 2018

mumia g

Philadelphia Common Pleas Court Judge Leon Tucker filed an order Dec. 7 giving 10 days for attorneys for Mumia Abu-Jamal and the Philadelphia district attorney’s office to provide input on former Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justice Ronald Castille’s possible violation of a PA Judicial Canon on Conduct requiring recusal if there was an appearance of bias or lack of impartiality.

Tucker is requesting opinions on how this code of conduct applies to Abu-Jamal’s appeal and how it fits into the U.S. Supreme Court case Williams v. Pennsylvania, upon which the appeal is based.  Lawyers must respond by Dec. 17 unless an extension is requested and granted.

Tucker took final arguments on Dec. 3 from attorneys for Abu-Jamal and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.  Both agreed they had no additional evidence to submit. The judge’s new request is very important in that it asks for opinions on how the application of the Judicial Canon on Conduct applies to Abu-Jamal’s case and how it fits into the Williams case.

The question of possible judicial bias extends to Castille’s activities on capital cases — not just as the former district attorney — but while he was running for election as a judge or was a judge.

 

Castille’s focus on ‘police killers’

Tucker is considering the broader argument that due process requires an unbiased decision maker. Abu-Jamal’s attorneys added this second legal basis to grant the political prisoner new appeal rights in amended petitions and oral arguments during an Oct. 29 court proceeding.  They argued that Williams provides a specific application of that principle as applied by SCOTUS in a case where the prosecutor later became the judge on the same case.

Due process claims based on judicial bias do not require proof of actual bias, only the appearance of bias — that “a reasonable observer could conclude that a judge harbored disqualifying bias against the petitioner.” The question is whether the judge would be neutral or whether there is unconstitutional potential for bias. The PA Supreme Court has maintained that recusal is required wherever there is substantial doubt about a jurist’s ability to preside impartially.

Commonwealth attorneys claim that during months of searching hundreds of boxes of DA records documents showing Castille was personally involved in Mumia’s case were not found. But the prosecution released documents that expose Castille’s personal bias on capital cases.  One was a letter DA Castille wrote in June 1990 to then Gov. Robert P. Casey, a death penalty opponent, who would not sign death warrants.

Urging Casey to “send a clear … message to all police killers that the death penalty in Pennsylvania actually means something,” Castille asked Casey to sign death warrants and provided him with a list of capital cases where they could be applied.

Abu-Jamal’s case was not on the list because his case was still being appealed to SCOTUS. However, Abu-Jamal’s attorneys assert that Castille’s letter to Casey targeted Abu-Jamal. His was one of three capital cases at that time involving a convicted so-called “police killer.” They charge that this reflects Castille’s personal involvement in a critical decision in Abu-Jamal’s case.

 

Castille: FOP’s ‘Man-of-the-Year’

Evidence also surfaced of DA Castille’s support for a campaign by former PA State Sen. Mike Fisher regarding passage of legislation that would further restrict state appeals of death penalty convictions.  The legislation included removal of final approval for death warrants from the governor’s office. A status report on certain death row inmates that was sent to Fisher included Abu-Jamal’s name.

Abu-Jamal’s attorneys stated on Oct. 29: “On Sept. 23, 1988, DA Castille wrote directly to Fisher urging passage of an amendment to the death penalty law and conveying his fears about the impact of Mills v. Maryland.” (That U.S. Supreme Court case, a 5-4 decision in 1988, reversed a Maryland Court of Appeals death sentence affirmation on the ground that the jury verdict form used was unconstitutional.) Castille feared that “Mills may lead to the vacating of scores of death penalties.”  Abu-Jamal’s appeal contained a Mills claim regarding Judge Albert Sabo’s improper instructions to the jury, which became the basis for overturning his death sentence.

There is ample evidence of other instances of Castille’s bias and that he took responsibility for death sentences. The Williams decision included citations from news articles quoting Castille bragging about putting “45 murderers on death row.”  Some 36,000 Pennsylvania police officers endorsed him. The Fraternal Order of Police gave Castille “Man-of-the-Year” awards, political support and donations during his campaign for the PA Supreme Court.

The American Bar Association filed an amicus brief in the Williams case, which noted that Castille was on “a crusade against” the Federal Community Defender Organization that represented Williams. The ABA notes, “He was incensed by its involvement in state post-conviction proceedings, and even more so by its zealotry on behalf of its clients.”

 

Refusal to recuse in Abu-Jamal’s case

In 1996 Abu-Jamal appealed his post-conviction challenge to his death sentence and death penalty denied by Judge Sabo to the PA Supreme Court over his 1982 conviction by a mostly white jury for the 1981 shooting of police officer Daniel Faulkner. He also filed a motion requesting that Justice Castille not hear the case. The grounds for requesting the recusal were based on Castille’s FOP relationship and defense of prosecutorial conduct in the face of evidence of significant prosecutorial misconduct.

As a former Philadelphia district attorney, Castille’s name appeared on appeal briefs, which argued that Abu-Jamal’s trial was fair and that evidence against him was compelling. Castille oversaw the legal efforts to keep Abu-Jamal on Pennsylvania’s death row.

Abu-Jamal’s lawyers at that time requested that Castille not deliberate over their client’s appeal because of his prior role as DA and his long-time association with the FOP, which actively campaigned for Abu-Jamal’s execution.

Arguing that his decision not to step down from the hearing was a “personal one for him alone to make,” Castille noted that while the FOP endorsed him, it also endorsed four other PA court justices hearing the case.  Castille claimed he had never “personally” participated in any aspect of Abu-Jamal’s case. Yet four years earlier when he ran for the state court, four aides reported that as district attorney, Castille was actively involved in death penalty cases, particularly “high-profile cases,” of which Abu-Jamal’s topped the list.

Whether Judge Tucker is genuinely interested in evidence of Castille’s inherent bias regarding the class of capital cases involving murders of police officers or if he is simply seeking to cover all bases and make his decision appeal-proof remains to be seen.  Due to the long history of this case, Abu-Jamal supporters know that reliance on the courts to rule fairly for Mumia is never a given.

Mumia Abu-Jamal is innocent.  A judicial win and granting new appeal rights for him would be a significant decision against the widespread policy whereby former prosecutors are elected and appointed as judges with the financial and political support of police organizations.

Abu-Jamal’s supporters have already launched an Emergency Response Network to fill the streets whichever way Judge Tucker rules. Demonstrations will take place outside the DA’s office at 4 p.m. on the day after Tucker’s decision. For more information and to sign the pledge to show up, go to Mobiliztion4Mumia.com.

Advertisements

urgent letters to mumia

October 15, 2018

Dear Friends and Comrades,

At this late date, given that Mumia’s next court hearing is on October 29, mumia abu many of us have felt that not enough attention has been paid to challenging Philadelphia’s widely hailed new, “liberal” District Attorney Larry Krasner. His deadly role in Mumia’s current legal proceedings in the Court of Common Pleas has not been understood by many Mumia supporters. People both in Philadelphia and around the country are still describing Krasner as a “breath of fresh air,” a major change agent in the criminal justice system, and a potentially fair DA in Mumia’s case.

While we agree that Krasner has made some important positive moves on several issues, he has, like all the previous DAs, been adamant in his denial of justice to Mumia. It is, therefore, urgent that we publicize the situation with Krasner and confront him with the fact that people are recognizing his deplorable role in the court process for Mumia. We must pressure him to drop his opposition to Mumia’s current legal action aimed at giving Mumia new rights of appeal of his conviction. Needless to say, regardless of the outcome of this legal struggle, we will continue to assert Mumia’s innocence and fight for his freedom. For further clarification and details on this potentially confusing legal situation, read the attached background piece, which will not be sent to Krasner, that will be mailed out to you next on this listserv.

Below is a letter we hope to send Krasner with as many organizational signatures as possible. We are focusing on organizations and some well-known individuals, but we urge others to send their own letter or the letter below to Krasner. (As a collective, we will only process organizational letters and a limited number of individual names to simplify the logistics involved. We plan to deliver the list of organizational signers along with the letter addressed to him to Krasner on October 25 at a press conference in Philadelphia.) We URGE YOU TO SEND THIS SAME LETTER OR YOUR OWN TO KRASNER DIRECTLY. HIS E-MAIL IS: justice@philadelphia.gov. Let’s flood Krasner’s lines! 

support debbie vincent

Debbie Vincent, long-term animal rights campaigner, comrade, and friend to many within the movement, was sentenced on 17th April to 6 years in prison, after a five-week long trial at Winchester Crown Court. Further to time in prison, she was given an Anti-Social Behavioural Order for an additional 5 years after her release.

Found guilty of ‘conspiracy to blackmail’, Debbie is the latest in a line of people persecuted for campaigning against the notorious animal testing lab Huntingdon Life Sciences, where 500 animals are killed daily. As part of the ‘Blackmail 3′, there are two more defendants currently awaiting a possible extradition from Holland to face trial. To find out more about the case and how to support the other, visit http://blackmail3.org. Debbie was found guilty, despite the judge not finding her guilty of any actions herself, with Michael Bowes QC, the case prosecutor, stating “there is no evidence that Ms Vincent was present at the scene of any of the attacks, or incidents in Europe. There is no evidence that she was outside of the United Kingdom at the time of any of these attacks”, whilst the Met Police deployed an undercover officer, posing as a private security manager, as part of a sting operation to implicate her in acts she had no involvement with.

Debbie’s case is part of a series of convictions against animal rights campaigners, and serves as a wake-up call to all activists to show support and solidarity to those who are victims of state repression following effective resistance to corporate and state power. For additional information on the ongoing repression of UK animal rights activists see http://stopukrepression.org/

When Nijmegen ABC asked Debbie what sort of support she might need if the received a custodial sentence, she replied – “Practically, I’m not sure what my needs will be in prison, it will depend to a degree to where I go. I’m pretty sure I’ll be able to cope, but being isolated from nature and friends will be the worst part. I will try to make the best of the bad situation, it’s all a bit daunting and new. The whole charge and court case are still amazingly surreal.”

“Keep on campaigning against all oppression and capitalist domination. Don’t be afraid to speak out and never apologise for trying to make a difference and caring.”

Support is as ever vital; write letters to Debbie in prison at:

Debbie Vincent (A5819DE)
HMP-YOI BRONZEFIELD
Woodthorpe Road,
Ashford,
Middlesex,
TW15 3JZ

“What is scary in this world is oppression and injustice, when people hurt people, animals and nature. What is beautiful in this world is resistance, when people say ‘enough is enough’ and act.

Oppression and injustice are everywhere, but so is resistance. Because some people know that if you fight you might lose, but if you don’t fight, you’ve already lost.”

Debbie Vincent

Film Night 11 June 2014

Anarchist Black Cross Melbourne will be screening the documentary “If A Tree Falls” at the Horn Of Plenty community centre 659 Plenty Road Reservoir at 7.30 on Wednesday 11 June as a fund raiser for Marie Mason.

About Marie Mason
Marie Mason is a loving mother of two and a long-time activist in the environmental and labor movements. In March 2008, she was arrested by federal authorities for charges related to two acts of property destruction that occurred in 1999 and 2000; no one was injured in either of them. She accepted a plea bargain and was sentenced on February 5, 2009 to just under 22 years. She is now serving the longest sentence of any “Green Scare” prisoner.

The “Green Scare” is the name given to the recent arrests of animal rights and environmental activists who have been charged with acts of economic sabotage. Federal authorities have sought outrageous sentences (often Life in prison) and have publicly and legally labeled the activists as “terrorists” – despite the fact that no one has been killed or injured in any of the acts.

Supporting Marie Mason does not mean agreeing with the actions that she took — but it does mean opposing the fear-mongering tactics of the federal government and the outrageous sentences they have imposed.

US prosecutors trying to block Rasmea Odeh’s release from jail

Update: US backs down

Supporters of Rasmea Odeh say government prosecutors have backed down from their latest attempt to delay the Palestinian American community leader’s release from jail.

Assisant US Attorney Jonathan Tukel withdrew the government’s motion challenging the source of the $50,000 that will be used to pay Odeh’s bond, according to a statement from the Rasmea Defense Committee, published by the US Palestinian Community Network on Wednesday evening.

The retreat came after US prosecutors deposed – or questioned – the anonymous donor who has put up the money.

According to the statement, the prosecutors asked whether the donor “is actually a friend or only a political supporter” of Odeh, “as well as challenging the donor’s views on Israeli military courts, the decisions of Judge Drain in the case, and the treatment of Palestinians by US federal courts.”

Odeh’s Detroit-based attorney William Goodman “objected to all of these political questions as irrelevant to the proceedings,” the statement says.

“Their actions are nothing but punitive in nature, and their questioning of the donor clearly affirms that their politics and ideology, not the law, govern their work,” Hatem Abudayyeh said in the statement, referring to the prosecutors.

If there are no further surprises, Abudayyeh, a lead organizer in the Rasmea Defense Committee, expects that bond will be posted on Thursday morning, and Odeh could be on her way back to Chicago that afternoon.
Original post

Federal prosecutors in Michigan are trying to stop Rasmea Odeh getting out of jail.

On Monday, US District Judge Gershwin Drain granted a defense motion to allow the Palestinian American community leader to go free on bond pending sentencing. This reversed a decision he made to jail her immediately after she was found guilty of immigration fraud in November.

But now prosecutors have raised objections to the source of $50,000 that would be used to pay her bond and get her out of the St. Clair County Jail in Port Huron, about an hour north of Detroit, where she has been held for exactly a month.

The bond will allow Odeh, 67, to return home to Chicago until her 10 March sentencing. The judge’s order requires her to report to a probation officer every two weeks, restricts her travel and prohibits her from obtaining a new passport.

The news of Drain’s decision cheered Odeh’s supporters, who had grown increasingly concerned over reports she had been held in sustained solitary confinement and was receiving inadequate medical attention.

But last night, lead US prosecutor Jonathan Tukel filed a motion with the court questioning the source of the bond money.

Citing the online requests for donations to support the Rasmea Defense Committee on stopFBI.net and US Palestinian Community Network, Tukel asserted that, “It is difficult to see how money raised by large numbers of people creates any incentive for Defendant Odeh to appear. It is likely she would suffer no personal loss by virtue of its forfeiture.”

Following the prosecution’s motion, Drain scheduled a hearing for tomorrow, 11 December, in Detroit.
“Moot Argument”

Hatem Abudayyeh, one of the lead organizers of the Rasmea Defense Committee, said, “The argument from the prosecution is moot.”

Speaking to The Electronic Intifada while en route to Detroit for tomorrow’s hearing, Abudayyeh explained: “We didn’t raise the bond by raising a bunch of one-dollar donations from thousands of people. We raised it with one person, who is a close friend and knows Odeh well. He is posting the entire bond.”

The Chicago-based person is being deposed today about his relationship with Odeh, and his testimony will be presented at tomorrow’s hearing. Odeh will also testify tomorrow.

“She would never flee and force him to lose what is essentially his life savings,” Abudayyeh said.

Abudayyeh is executive director of the Arab American Action Network, a Chicago organization that works with Arab immigrants in the city, where Odeh serves as associate director.
Punishment for exercising due process?

Odeh’s defense has filed a motion for a new trial, citing several grievances with the way November trial was conducted. The prosecution and Drain have used Odeh’s dissatisfaction with the trial and guilty verdict as justification to keep her detained.

Drain wrote in his ruling on Monday, “It is of course not lost on this Court that Defendant’s testimony concerning her escape from prison in Israel suggests her belief that her actions were warranted because her conviction was unjustified. Defendant has expressed a similar feeling concerning her recent conviction for unlawful procurement of naturalization.”

Odeh’s conviction stems from her failure to disclose in an immigration form her 1969 conviction in an Israeli military court for a role in two bombings. Odeh has consistently stated that the conviction was based on a confession Israeli interrogators extracted through prolonged torture and sexual assault.141110-rasmea-odeh_0

Freedom fighter, journalist and political prisoner Mumia Abu-Jamal speaks out on behalf of Nestora Salgado

nes

In two broadcasts on Prison Radio—which is carried by over one hundred radio stations—Abu-Jamal explains the case of indigenous leader Nestora Salgado who is a political prisoner in Mexico. He also reads excerpts from her October message to students protesting the disappearance (and now presumed death) of 43 of their classmates in Ayotzinapa in the state of Guerrero.

Intro by Mumia Abu-Jamal

Nestora Salgado’s statement

Mumia Abu-Jamal is an internationally renowned journalist, author and activist from Philadelphia who has been in prison since 1981 when he was framed for shooting a police officer. He spent decades on death row, but his sentence was reduced to life in 2011. Despite overwhelming evidence of his innocence, prosecutorial misconduct and police coercion of witnesses, he remains imprisoned in Waynesburg, Pennsylvania. He is known as the “Voice of the Voiceless” for his award-winning commentaries.

Prison Radio broadcasts the voices of prisoners. They were recently targeted by Pennsylvania Governor Tom Corbett, who signed into law SB508, which prohibits prisoners and those formerly incarcerated from speaking publicly, a piece of legislation meant to silence Mumia Abu-Jamal. Find out how you can support Prison Radio’s lawsuit to overturn this attack on free speech at PrisonRadio.org.

Take action now to demand Nestora’s release

The September disappearance of the 43 activist students from Ayotzinapa, Guerrero, has led to nationwide protests and renewed calls for the release of Salgado and other community police framed and imprisoned on charges that have no legal standing. The governor and key political figures in Guerrero have been forced to resign due to their role in the kidnapping of the students and protesters are now calling for Mexican President Peña Nieto to step down.

Now is a critical time for human rights activists to press both the U.S. and Mexican governments for Nestora Salgado’s release. In the sixteen months since she was illegally arrested, the U.S. State Department has yet to contact Nestora’s family or make any public statement about her incarceration!

Please send letters urging U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry to intervene to obtain Nestora Salgado’s release:

Secretary of State John Kerry
U.S. Department of State
2201 C Street NW
Washington D.C. 20520

Please send letters to the President of Mexico demanding the release of Nestora Salgado, as well as the release of Marco Suástegui, Gonzálo Molina, Arturo Campos, and all the community police and other self-defense forces who are unjustly incarcerated:

The Honorable Enrique Peña Nieto, President of Mexico
San Miguel Chapultepec
11850, Ciudad de México
Distrito Federal
MEXICO

For more information and updates, please visit http://www.FreeNestora.org.
friend on Facebook | forward to a friend
Copyright © 2014 Free Nestora Salgado, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you have asked to be kept informed of efforts to free Nestora Salgado
Our mailing address is:
Free Nestora Salgado
5018 Rainier Avenue S.
Seattle, WA 98118

Add us to your address book

Email Marketing Powered by MailChimp
unsubscribe from this list | update subscription preferences

Reply, Reply all or Forward | More
Freedom Socialist Party – National Office
To
me
Dec 27 at 5:02 AM
This message contains blocked images.
In two broadcasts on Prison Radio—which is carried by over one hundred radio stations—Abu-Jamal explains the case of indigenous leader Nestora Salgado who is a political prisoner in Mexico. …

Is this email not displaying correctly?
View it in your browser.
Freedom Socialist Party

Twitter Facebook MySpace Digg StumbleUpon Delicious

From: Libertad para Nestora/Freedom for Nestora – U.S. Campaign

Freedom fighter, journalist and political prisoner
Mumia Abu-Jamal speaks out on behalf of
Nestora Salgado

In two broadcasts on Prison Radio—which is carried by over one hundred radio stations—Abu-Jamal explains the case of indigenous leader Nestora Salgado who is a political prisoner in Mexico. He also reads excerpts from her October message to students protesting the disappearance (and now presumed death) of 43 of their classmates in Ayotzinapa in the state of Guerrero.

Intro by Mumia Abu-Jamal

Nestora Salgado’s statement

Mumia Abu-Jamal is an internationally renowned journalist, author and activist from Philadelphia who has been in prison since 1981 when he was framed for shooting a police officer. He spent decades on death row, but his sentence was reduced to life in 2011. Despite overwhelming evidence of his innocence, prosecutorial misconduct and police coercion of witnesses, he remains imprisoned in Waynesburg, Pennsylvania. He is known as the “Voice of the Voiceless” for his award-winning commentaries.

Prison Radio broadcasts the voices of prisoners. They were recently targeted by Pennsylvania Governor Tom Corbett, who signed into law SB508, which prohibits prisoners and those formerly incarcerated from speaking publicly, a piece of legislation meant to silence Mumia Abu-Jamal. Find out how you can support Prison Radio’s lawsuit to overturn this attack on free speech at PrisonRadio.org.

Take action now to demand Nestora’s release

The September disappearance of the 43 activist students from Ayotzinapa, Guerrero, has led to nationwide protests and renewed calls for the release of Salgado and other community police framed and imprisoned on charges that have no legal standing. The governor and key political figures in Guerrero have been forced to resign due to their role in the kidnapping of the students and protesters are now calling for Mexican President Peña Nieto to step down.

Now is a critical time for human rights activists to press both the U.S. and Mexican governments for Nestora Salgado’s release. In the sixteen months since she was illegally arrested, the U.S. State Department has yet to contact Nestora’s family or make any public statement about her incarceration!

Please send letters urging U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry to intervene to obtain Nestora Salgado’s release:

Secretary of State John Kerry
U.S. Department of State
2201 C Street NW
Washington D.C. 20520

Please send letters to the President of Mexico demanding the release of Nestora Salgado, as well as the release of Marco Suástegui, Gonzálo Molina, Arturo Campos, and all the community police and other self-defense forces who are unjustly incarcerated:

The Honorable Enrique Peña Nieto, President of Mexico
San Miguel Chapultepec
11850, Ciudad de México
Distrito Federal
MEXICO

For more information and updates, please visit http://www.FreeNestora.org.

June 11 international day for long term anarchist prisoners

A banner was dropped on a windy day in the western suburbs of narrm/ Melbourne over a pedestrian footbridge  over the busy westgate freeway on the 14th of June to show solidarity to long term anarchist prisoners .  June 11 is the official date of tub world wide action. , but never too late  to show solidarity . We reconise that we are the land we stand on is the land of the wurundjeri people’s  whi h has been stolen by colonizers . ( written on the banner free all long term anarchist prisoners  and the names of some of the prisoners  , Marius mason , jock palfreemanNd Thomas Meyer talk

Surviving cancer & a car accident

We’re here to raise money for Eric’s partner, and their two children who are currently experiencing financial hardship. Life is already tough as a mother of two with her partner in prisoner, but she was also recently in a car accident, which thankfully left her in okay shape, but destroyed her car. Even more recently she was diagnosed with thyroid cancer, the severity and treatment of which is still being determined. Treatment for the pain alone will financially destabilize the family, on top of future specialists visit, car repairs, and potential unemployment (due to the chronic pain experienced).

Eric’s partner tirelessly supports him, facilitates excellent communication between Eric and the outside world, consistently advocates for his rights inside the prison, emotionally supports him through the political battles on the inside, and drives hours to visit him every week, on top on tending to the needs of their children and working.

The recent developments in her life could have devastating impacts for her and her family. Donations are needed asap as the financial toll of these recent development have already taken effect. All of the funds donated will be used by her to support herself and her children in this difficult time in her life

.https://www.gofundme.com/surviving-cancer-and-a-car-accident31178554_1531165417231233_r

Indonesia: Trial Update on Yogyakarta Prisoners!

Indonesia: Trial Update on Yogyakarta Prisoners!

We need to explain, that we have difficulty finding information regarding detainees due to separate case files and also different the trial schedules between them and the schedules change of the trial day, but this did not stop us from giving information to you (readers).

Since October 6, 2018, we have been striving to get the latest information regarding the Class War Prisoners in Yogyakarta who were related to the M1 incident that happened in the past at the intersection of UIN Yogyakarta, from those 11 prisoners they have all received legal assistance ( Advocate), with the following details:

  • 4 comrades (Students of UIN & Mercubuana) accompanied by the HMI advocacy team
  • 1 comrade (Printing Worker) is accompanied by a team of OBH, including LBH Yogyakarta
  • 1 cormade (UIN student) accompanied by Widhie
  • 1 comrade (UAD students) accompanied by Arsiko Dani Windo from PBHI Yogyakarta
  • 4 other comrades (students of UII & Sanata Dharma) accompanied by LKBH UII

Here we only explain in general that some prisoners have received prisoners’ decisions, prisoner demands, and are still in the process of witnesses from the Public Prosecutor, as for, those of you who want to know the information in each trial of each individual (the prisoners) you can access via the internet (pn-sleman.go.id) according to the case file you want.

+ MD has received a detention decision for 5 months, withholding period (estimated to be free on 9 October 2018) 323 / Pid.B / 2018 / PN Smn

+ OO has received a detention decision for 5 months, withholding period (estimated to be free on 9 October 2018) 325 / Pid.B / 2018 / PN Smn

+ MI and MEA get a detention decision for 5 months and 15 days, withholding period (estimated to be free on October 14, 2018) 305 / Pid.B / 2018 / PN Smn

+ ZW and AMH get a detention decision for 5 months and 15 days, withholding period (estimated to be free on October 14, 2018) 306 / Pid.B / 2018 / PN Smn

+ AAD gets a maximum of 10 months in prison (the prisoner’s decision is scheduled for the next 2 weeks) 394 / Pid.B / 2018 / PN Smn

+ BV, AM, W are still in the trial process of witnesses from the Public Prosecutor (continuing until 9 October 2018) 369 / Pid.B / 2018 / PN Smn

+ MC is still in the process of hearing witnesses from the Public Prosecutor (continuing until 9 October 2018) 445 / Pid.B / 2018 / PN Smn

HI, COMRADE, WE ARE WAITING FOR U TO BE FREE TO JOIN TOGETHER AND BREATHE FRESH AIR!

____________________________________________________________________

Perlu kami perjelaskan, bahwa kami kesulitan untuk mencari sebuah informasi terkait para tahanan dikarenakan berkas perkara yang terpisah dan juga jadwal persidangan yang saling berbeda antara mereka dan juga perpindahan hari persidangan, tetapi hal ini tidak membuat kami dan kawan-kawan lainnya berhenti untuk memberi informasi terhadap kalian (pembaca).

Sejak saat ini, 6 Oktober 2018, kami terus mengupayakan untuk mendapatkan informasi terbaru terkait para tahanan perang kelas Yogyakarta yang terkait dengan peristiwa M1 yang telah terjadi pada waktu lalu di pertigaan UIN Yogyakarta, dari ke-11 para tahanan tersebut  mereka semua telah mendapatkan pendampingan hukum (Advokat), dengan rincian sebagai berikut:

  • 4 comrades (Mahasiswa UIN & Mercubuana) didampingi oleh tim advokasi HMI
  • 1 comrade (Pekerja Sablon) didampingi oleh tim OBH, termasuk LBH Yogyakarta
  • 1 cormade ( mahasiswa UIN) didampingi oleh Widhie
  • 1 comrade (mahasiswa UAD) didampingi oleh Arsiko Dani Windo dari PBHI Yogyakarta
  • 4 comrades lainnya (mahasiswa UII & Sanata Dharma) didampingi oleh LKBH UII

 

Disini kami hanya menjelaskan secara umum dengan beberapa tahanan telah mendapatkan putusan tahanan, tuntutan tahanan, dan juga masih dalam proses saksi dari JP, adapun, dari kalian yang ingin mengetahui informasi-informasi ditiap persidangan dari setiap individu (para tahanan) kalian bisa mengakses melalui internet (pn-sleman.go.id) sesuai dengan berkas perkara yang kalian inginkan.

+ MD telah mendapatkan putusan tahanan selama 5 bulan, dipotong masa tahanan (diperkirakan bebas pada tanggal 9 Oktober 2018) 323/Pid.B/2018/PN Smn

+ OO  telah mendapatkan putusan tahanan selama 5 bulan, dipotong masa tahanan (diperkirakan bebas pada tanggal 9 Oktober 2018) 325/Pid.B/2018/PN Smn

+ MI dan MEA mendapatkan putusan tahanan selama 5 bulan 15 hari, dipotong masa tahanan (diperkirakan bebas pada tanggal 14 Oktober 2018) 305/Pid.B/2018/PN Smn

+ ZW dan AMH mendapatkan putusan tahanan selama 5 bulan 15 hari, dipotong masa tahanan (diperkirakan bebas pada tanggal 14 Oktober 2018) 306/Pid.B/2018/PN Smn

+ AAD mendapatkan tuntutan tahanan maksimal 10 bulan (putusan tahanan dijadwalkan 2 minggu kedepan) 394/Pid.B/2018/PN Smn

+ BV, AM, W masih dalam proses persidangan saksi dari JPU (berlanjut hingga tanggal 9 Oktober 2018) 369/Pid.B/2018/PN Smn

+ MC masih dalam proses persidangan saksi dari JPU (berlanjut hingga tanggal 9 Oktober 2018) 445/Pid.B/2018/PN Smn

 

HAI, KAWAN! KAMI MENUNGGU KALIAN BEBAS, DAN KEMBALI BERSAMA KAMI UNTUK MENGHIDUP UDARA SEGAR!

AN UPDATE ON MUMIA ABU JAMAL

From NYC Jericho

MMAJ

The Philadelphia Tribune

Lawyers arguing for another appeal in the case of former death-row inmate Mumia Abu-Jamal were granted a 60-day continuance due to a late piece of evidence presented earlier this week by the prosecution.

Abu-Jamal attorney Judith Ritter argued successfully that a May 5, 1988, letter from the office of then District Attorney Ron Castille to a state representative discussing death penalty cases warranted the continuance to allow an extended period of discovery to allow the search for more evidence that may link Castille to the new document.
Ritter argued the letter demonstrated Castille’s bias in seeking the death penalty against defendants convicted of killing police officers.
“This demonstrates a possible link that Ron Castille was involved in seeking capital executions and that he was specifically tracking capital cases involving police officers,” Ritter argued before Judge Leon Tucker in Common Pleas Court. “It (the letter) indicates his bias, and it’s on those grounds that we’re seeking a continuance.”
Abu-Jamal’s lawyers are seeking to re-appeal his conviction in the 1981 shooting death of Philadelphia police officer Daniel Faulkner.
Castille was the district attorney when Abu-Jamal was convicted. As a member of the state Supreme Court, he twice refused to recuse himself for two separate Abu-Jamal appeals.
As a prosecutor, Castille prevailed in getting the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to uphold Abu-Jamal’s conviction and death sentence in 1989.
Then as a Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justice, Castille agreed with the arguments he had made as district attorney.
In two separate failed attempts to appeal — in 1998 and again in 2012 — Castille supported his position as district attorney to deny Abu-Jamal’s lawyers’ efforts.
Earlier this year, Tucker ordered Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner’s office to search for any record of Castille’s “personal involvement” in the Abu-Jamal case.
Krasner’s office announced that additional evidence was not found, prompting Tucker to extend the discovery period again.
Before announcing his decision of the latest extension, Tucker appeared annoyed that the latest piece of evidence had not been turned over to Abu-Jamal’s defense.
“There needs to be a thorough search of all the records in all units,” Tucker said. “It is troubling that the letter was not produced until Monday. If this letter was addressed from Mr. Castille, that would make a big difference.”
Daniel Faulkner’s widow, Maureen, flew in from California for the hearing. She thanked Krasner’s officer for its support.
Standing next to Faulkner in the blazing heat alongside the Juanita Kidd Stout Center for Criminal Justice was Philadelphia Fraternal Order of Police President John McNesby. He and other FOP members accompanied Maureen Faulkner into the courtroom.
“When does it end for Maureen? Danny was assassinated — it’s been proving over and over again. This is a fishing expedition,” McNesby said. “Maureen is flying back and forth across the country and we are here to support her. We’ll continue to fight. We’ll be here for every hearing that takes place.
“But where is the closure for the family? When does it end? And after Oct. 29, we might as well get another date because they’ll find something else.”
Abu-Jamal’s petition is based on a 2016 U.S. Supreme Court decision, Williams vs. Pennsylvania.
The Supreme Court held that a prosecutor involved in seeking the death penalty for a defendant should recuse himself if asked to judge an appeal in the capital case.